Zapier vs Make vs n8n: Which Automation Tool Fits You?
By Nemanja Vukmirović, Lizzard Solutions. Last updated 8 November 2026.
You have a contact form, a CRM, a spreadsheet and a team chat, and someone still copies every new lead between them by hand. Choosing an automation tool fixes that, but Zapier vs Make vs n8n is a confusing comparison, because the three tools count usage in completely different ways.
This guide compares them on what actually matters to a small business: how you are billed, how hard they are to learn, where your data lives, and when it is smarter to write code instead. It ends with a worked example that counts the usage of one real-world workflow on all three.
TL;DR
- Zapier is the easiest start and has the biggest app catalogue; it bills per successful action step (a “task”).
- Make gives you a visual canvas with more control over branching and data; it bills per module action (a “credit”).
- n8n bills per whole workflow run (an “execution”) and can be self-hosted, which suits technical teams and strict data rules.
- Count your steps and monthly runs before you pick. The same workflow can cost very different amounts on each tool.
Zapier vs Make vs n8n: What Is the Difference?
Zapier, Make and n8n are workflow automation platforms: tools that connect your apps so an event in one (a new form entry, a paid invoice, a new email) triggers actions in others without anyone copying data. Zapier is a hosted, no-code tool built around linear “Zaps”. Make is a hosted visual builder where you draw “scenarios” as connected modules. n8n is a node-based tool you can use in n8n’s cloud or install on your own server.
All three can send data to almost any service with an API, so the real difference is not “can it connect to my app”. It is how they bill, who can maintain them, and where they run. If you are new to the idea itself, start with our guide to business process automation for small businesses.
Key takeaway
Pick on billing model, skills and data location, not on logo count. All three handle common small-business workflows.
How Do Zapier, Make and n8n Count Usage?
This is where most surprise bills come from. Each vendor uses a different unit, and the definitions below are taken from their own pricing pages as of November 2026.
| Tool | Billing unit | What counts | What does not count |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier | Task | Each successful action step in a Zap. | The trigger, polling for new data, failed steps, and built-in tools such as Filter, Formatter and Paths. |
| Make | Credit (replaced “operations” in August 2025) | Each module action, including reading data from an app or webhook. Most actions use 1 credit; some AI features use more. | Router and error-handler modules. |
| n8n | Execution | One full run of a workflow, however many steps it has or however much data it processes. | Individual steps inside the run. |
Prices and plan limits change often, so check Zapier’s pricing page, Make’s pricing page and n8n’s pricing page on the day you decide. Notable details at the time of writing: Zapier’s free plan includes 100 tasks a month and only two-step Zaps; Make’s free plan includes 1,000 credits a month; n8n’s paid plans include unlimited users and workflows.
Key takeaway
Long workflows favour n8n’s per-run billing; short, simple ones are cheap anywhere. Zapier and Make both scale with the number of steps.
Action for today: list your three most annoying manual tasks and write down how many steps each one has and how many times a month it happens.
Which Tool Is Easiest for a Non-Technical Team?
- Zapier is the gentlest start. You build top-to-bottom: trigger, then actions. Its catalogue lists 9,000+ apps, so local or niche tools are more likely to have a ready connector.
- Make takes a little longer to learn, but its canvas shows branches, loops and data mapping visually. Teams that outgrow a straight line of steps often find it clearer.
- n8n is aimed at more technical users. It still has a visual editor, but it shines when someone is comfortable with JSON, HTTP requests and short JavaScript or Python code steps.
A practical rule: if the person who will maintain the workflow is an office manager, start with Zapier or Make. If it is a developer or an IT partner, n8n is often the better long-term fit.
Action for today: name the person who will fix the workflow when it breaks. Choose the tool that person can read.
Where Does Your Data Live? (GDPR and Serbia)
Every automation passes customer data, such as names, emails and order details, through a third party. Under the EU GDPR and Serbia’s Law on Personal Data Protection (ZZPL), you need to know which processors handle that data and where. This is not legal advice, but it should influence the choice:
- Zapier and Make are hosted services. Review each vendor’s data processing terms and hosting region before you send personal data through them.
- n8n Cloud states on its pricing page that hosted data is stored in the EU, on servers in Frankfurt, Germany.
- Self-hosted n8n runs wherever you install it, for example on a server you already control. The n8n self-hosting documentation covers Docker and other setups. You then own updates, backups and security.
Watch out
Self-hosting is not automatically “more secure”. An unpatched automation server holding API keys to your CRM and email is a serious risk. Only self-host if someone will maintain it, and back it up like any other system, as in our 3-2-1 data backup guide.
Action for today: mark which of your planned workflows carry personal data. Those deserve the most care in tool choice.
Worked Example: One Lead Workflow on All Three Tools
Take a fictional heating and air-conditioning workshop in Niš that receives about 200 quote requests a month through its website. Each request should do four things automatically:
- create a contact in the CRM,
- add a row to the “Leads” Google Sheet,
- notify the team in its chat app,
- send the customer a confirmation email.
That is one trigger (the form submission arrives by webhook) and four actions. Applying each vendor’s published counting rules gives this monthly usage estimate:
| Tool | Usage per lead | Usage per month (200 leads) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier | 4 tasks (the trigger is free) | 800 tasks | Above the free plan’s 100 tasks, and a multi-step Zap needs a paid plan anyway. |
| Make | 5 credits (reading the webhook counts too) | 1,000 credits | Equal to the free plan’s monthly allowance, so test runs or growth push you onto a paid plan. |
| n8n | 1 execution | 200 executions | The same count whether the workflow has 4 steps or 14. Self-hosted, you pay for the server and upkeep instead. |
Now imagine the owner adds a lead-scoring step, a filter for spam, and a follow-up task in the CRM. On Zapier, the filter itself is free, but every extra action adds tasks per lead. On Make, each module adds credits. On n8n, the count stays at 200. These are estimates from the vendors’ own rules, not quotes; run a test month before committing.
Key takeaway
Multiply steps by monthly runs before you compare prices. That single number usually decides the tool.
Action for today: do this calculation for your own top workflow, using the table above as a template.
When Should You Skip No-Code and Build a Custom Integration?
Automation platforms are great until a workflow becomes core to how you earn money. Consider a custom API integration when:
- monthly runs reach a level where per-task or per-credit costs exceed what a small service would cost to host,
- the workflow needs complex logic, retries and audit logs that are awkward to express in a visual builder,
- you must keep data inside your own infrastructure, or integrate a local system without a ready connector, such as a Serbian accounting or eFaktura tool.
The trade-off mirrors the one in our custom software vs off-the-shelf guide: rented tools are faster to start, custom code is cheaper and more controllable at scale. Many businesses use both, with a platform for simple glue and custom code for the critical path.
Action for today: flag any workflow that, if it stopped for a day, would lose you money. That one deserves monitoring, whichever tool runs it.
Zapier vs Make vs n8n: Quick Recommendation
| If you… | Start with |
|---|---|
| want the fastest setup and have no technical staff | Zapier |
| need branching, loops or heavier data mapping on a budget | Make |
| run long, frequent workflows or need EU or self-hosted data control | n8n |
| want an AI assistant answering customers alongside automations | Any of the three, plus a dedicated chatbot (see our AI chatbot guide) |
Zapier vs Make vs n8n: FAQ
Is n8n free?
The self-hosted Community Edition is available on GitHub under n8n’s Sustainable Use License, so you pay no licence fee but do pay for hosting and maintenance. n8n Cloud and advanced features such as SSO are paid plans billed per execution.
Is Make cheaper than Zapier?
Often for multi-step workflows, but not always. Zapier does not charge for triggers or its built-in filter and formatter tools, while Make counts most module actions, including reading data. Count your steps and runs with each vendor’s current rules.
Can these tools connect to apps without a ready integration?
Yes. All three can call any service with a web API through an HTTP or webhook step. On Zapier, webhooks require a paid plan.
Which is best for a small business in Serbia?
It depends on who maintains it and what data you move. Zapier or Make suit non-technical teams; n8n suits teams with technical help or strict data-location needs. Check that your local tools offer an API before you commit to any platform.
If you want an outside view, our team can map your workflows and set up the right tool as part of our automation and integration services.
Not sure which automation tool fits your workflows?
Send us your three most time-consuming manual tasks. We will tell you which tool fits, what it will roughly use per month, and whether custom code makes more sense.
Book a free consultation